Home Blog Page 8523

Unix + Linux = Caldera: Company continues Unix support but predicts move to Linux

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

So where is Caldera going with its older operating systems? Linux may
be all fine and dandy, but the fate of OpenServer is what the people
at the DTR Business Systems reseller
show
in Las Vegas earlier this month wanted to know, and Caldera’s CEO
Ransom Love was there to give them answers.
The DTR resellers — for the most part old line Intel Unix resellers
and integrators working in vertical markets such as bookstores,
clothing manufacturers and the oil trade — were pleased to hear that
Caldera will not put the older Unix
OpenServer
out to pasture after years of neglect from former
owner SCO. In the past, SCO tried to move OpenServer users and
resellers to UnixWare — now OpenUnix — but
they simply wouldn’t budge.

Why not? Because, as Rene Beltran, vice
president of sales for DTR, says: “OpenServer already does everything
the customers want.” DTR, a value-added reseller that works with
resellers, integrators and customers, still sells 20 times the copies of the older OpenServer operating system as OpenUnix copies, he says.

It’s not just DTR. According to Dan Kusnetzky, IDC’s vice president
for system software research, OpenServer has a much larger market
share than the often touted, but it would seem seldom deployed,
OpenUnix.

Indeed, the resellers see their OpenServer market getting bigger. As
Microsoft’s support for NT diminishes the resellers see this as an
opportunity to move Linux — not Unix — in. Because of the name
recognition, though, when do they manage to find someone who wants
Linux, they’re finding it much easier to move Red Hat than Caldera.
They’re also seeing a fair amount of demand for W2K. Customers invite them in
and ask for W2K by name.

Many of the resellers are reluctant to do sell Windows, though, because their expertise is
in Unix. They’re also finding sticker shock with some customers as
the customer begins to understand what W2K’s higher client access
license (CAL) costs mean to their bottom line.

Most of these resellers also have had bad experiences with
Microsoft’s quality and security, and they know full well that when
something goes wrong, they, not Microsoft, will be the ones called on
the carpet. Thanks to OpenServer’s incredibly high level of stability
and plentiful small business applications, many of them would rather sell
OpenServer over any other OS any day of the week.

OpenUnix, the former UnixWare, remains unpopular. This dates
back to the SCO’s days of the late ’90s when, from the resellers’ perspective,
SCO tried to force them and their customers to move from OpenServer
to UnixWare. This then new operating system cost more, would require
many programs to be ported at their cost, and didn’t offer any
worthwhile advantages. To them OpenServer is still the operating
system of choice, if Caldera supports it.

Love has answered many of their concerns by assuring the group that
OpenServer will continue to be supported and that OpenUnix would get
an OpenServer Kernel Personality, which would enable them first to
move their existing applications to OpenUnix and, in 2003, to
OpenLinux.

Caldera will continue updating OpenServer with driver updates and a
refresh of the operating system, in the third quarter of 2002, that
will bring OpenServer up to version 5.0.7.

At about the same time, to make OpenUnix more attractive, Caldera
will be adding an OpenServer Kernel Personality to OpenUnix. This
will enable users to run OpenServer programs on OpenUnix come the day
that they need OpenUnix’s much more powerful database infrastructure
and or need up to eight-way processing power. Caldera hopes that
OpenServer users who want server-consolidation will then use this as
an upgrade path.

Even after this, however, Caldera doesn’t plan on giving OpenServer a
gold watch on the way out the door. In 2003, if there continues to be
a demand for it, Caldera will bring a Linux Kernel Personality to
OpenServer. With the LKP, users will be able to run Linux programs on
OpenServer.

Caldera will also continue to upgrade its Linux operating system,
with OpenLinux
3.1.2
due out in the third quarter.

Looking ahead, Love says on all three operating systems, there will
be more frequent feature patches rather than frequent periodical
major releases. Love added, “Users and resellers don’t want major
releases, because installing them is too expensive, and they cause
work disturbances.”

Caldera will also strive to make “it easier to switch between the
operating systems, thus enabling administrators to mix and match.
This will also make it easier to migrate between environments and
consolidate servers.”

How can Caldera afford to support three operating systems? Love
explained that because OpenServer and OpenUnix are already stable,
they don’t require a tremendous amount of development work. Instead,
most of the development dollars are focused on Linux.

Eventually, Caldera thinks Linux will win out. OpenLinux alone is
making the jump
to the IA-64 architecture
.

But, as Love says, while it’s possible that “Linux may replace Unix,
we see Unix and Linux as compatible. We don’t see, as Red Hat does,
one replacing the other.”

Love also made it clear that Caldera will not be following Red Hat to the enterprise space. Instead, Caldera
will
concentrate on selling to small- to medium-sized businesses and
branch
offices through its reseller channel. As Love says, “The solution
provider is our customer, not the end user.”

Category:

  • Unix

The Microsoft penalty that isn’t

Dave B writes “Cnet carrys this story by Bruce Perens who explains how, despite their pledges to interoperability the new MS license makes it impossible for Linux to work with MS software. Openoffice and evolution are next…

http://news.com.com/2010-1075-882846.html

Linux 2.4 kernel maintainer deported from U.S.

Anonymous Reader writes “Marcelo Tosatti, the 2.4 kernel maintainer, was ejected from the U.S. last week in a visa snafu, according to Linux and Main.”

Mainframe Linux advocates explain it all

RackIT writes “ZDNet got a reality check about the benefits of running Linux on the mainframe. Real mainframe Linux system programmers couldn’t let ZDNet get away with trashing Linux on the mainframe. They responded quickly and strongly with informed corrections and intentions.”

Category:

  • Linux

Turbolinux releases second Linux Server OS for IBM

Anonymous Reader writes “San Francisco, Calif., April 15, 2002 Turbolinux®, Inc., a worldwide leader in Linux operating environments and multi-platform software deployment and management products, today announced a Turbolinux 7 Server for IBM eServer iSeries, a fully supported Linux distribution for iSeries. This latest release is based on the leading-edge 64-bit kernel and is Turbolinux.s second distribution for iSeries. The distribution also includes IBM’s Java 1.3.1 and an ODBC driver for connectivity to OS/400’s DB2/400 database.

IBM iSeries is a popular choice with small to mid-sized businesses because it features efficiencies that make management simpler and also dramatically reduce IT costs for the thousands of companies that use the IBM eServer iSeries platform to run their businesses. With iSeries for Linux, mid-sized enterprises can take advantage of advanced IBM logical partitioning technology, a powerful server consolidation solution previously available only to IBM enterprise customers on its eServer zSeries mainframes. A single iSeries system can be partitioned to create up to 31 separate Linux servers, providing customers an easy-to-manage alternative to the high cost and complexity of server farms. Each Linux server runs in its own partition and is able to share processors, disk, tape, CD-ROM, DVD and LAN resources with the other applications running on the iSeries system.

“The partnership between Turbolinux and IBM has a history of introducing innovations that benefit customers,” said Ly-Huong Pham, CEO of Turbolinux. “With a reliable software infrastructure based on Turbolinux 7 Server and an IBM iSeries high-availability hardware infrastructure, our two companies are making cost-effective Linux deployments a reality within enterprises around the globe.”

“Our continuing relationship brings Linux into the mid-range server market and offers an integrated solution that combines the strengths of Linux and IBM OS/400,” said Kimberly Stevenson, vice president, marketing operations, iSeries at IBM. “Linux enables a new stream of e-business applications for IBM eServer iSeries, and backed by 24×7 support such as that offered by Turbolinux, provides a great solution for any mid-sized enterprise looking to get the cost and functionality benefits of Linux.”

Turbolinux first made their iSeries distribution and support available in August, 2001 beating out the competition, to the surprise of some industry watchers (Editor’s Note: August 2, 2001 Turbolinux Supports IBM eServer, Bringing Linux Support and Stability to Thousands of Mid-Sized Businesses).

Price and Availability

Turbolinux 7 Server for IBM eServer iSeries is available today. Pricing depends on the customer’s system configuration specifications, and support and service requirements. Turbolinux currently supports IBM’s G4, G5, G6, MP2000 and MP3000 systems and IBM eServer pSeries and zSeries, as well. For more information, please contact sales@turbolinux.com.

About Turbolinux

Founded in 1992, Turbolinux® Inc. is a global software company providing Linux operating environments and multi-platform software deployment and management products that allow computing assets to be quickly redefined on demand enabling true flexible processing power. Backed by some of the world’s leading technology companies, including Compaq, Dell, Fujitsu, Hitachi, IBM, Intel, NEC, Novell, Oracle, SGI and Toshiba, Turbolinux is headquartered near San Francisco with offices around the world. For more information, visit the Turbolinux Web site at http://www.turbolinux.com.”

Distribution Watch: Gentoo Linux

LinuxPlanet: “Gentoo Linux is a relative newcomer to the world of Linux distributions.
Rather than trying to be everything to everyone, this distro is tightly
targeted at software developers and network administrators, which means
that the new or even average Linux user may not be too interested in
trying it out.” Read more here.

Category:

  • Linux

Red Hat bitten by Linux’s low cost

“Late last month, Red Hat introduced a new version of its software, Red Hat Linux Advanced Server, geared specifically to large corporate customers. It’s the linchpin of the Raleigh, N.C., company’s new strategy: Selling Linux software and support services to the deepest pockets in business.” Read more in this Seattle Post-Intelligence article.

Midgard presentation from Open Source CMS conference

Henri Bergius writes: The Midgard presentation held by Henri Bergius in the Open Source Content Management Conference in Zürich, Switzerland is now available online.
The presentation can be downloaded as a PDF document:

midgard-oscmsc.pdf (465KB PDF)

Henri’s presentation is also viewable in the RealPlayer format:

Streaming version (Bitflux GmbH)

The first annual Open Source Content Management Conference was held in Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH) in Zürich, Switzerland. The conference was a great success with most major Open Source CMS projects attending. More information about the conference can be found from http://www.oscom.org/conferences/zurich2002/

Henri Bergius is a co-founder of the Midgard project, and a partner of Nemein, a finnish Midgard solution provider. Henri’s main responsibilities are in coordinating Nemein’s product development for the Midgard platform. Henri’s previous appearances have included Global Linux 2000 in South Korea and Linux Expo Madrid 2001 in Spain.

Contact information:

Henri Bergius, Nemein
henri.bergius@nemein.com
+358-20-198 6032

http://www.nemein.com/
http://www.midgard-project.org/
http://bergie.iki.fi/

Category:

  • Open Source

FDA validation a threat to Free/OSS?

I. Valdes writes, “Arnaud Le Breton wrote in asking about the ‘regulatory aspects’ of medical open source especially in view of the FDA’s recent revised document, General Principles of Software Validation: Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, which includes the following statement: ‘…computer systems used to create, modify, and maintain electronic records and to manage electronic signatures are also subject to the validation requirements. (See 21 CFR §11.10(a).) Such computer systems must be validated to ensure accuracy, reliability, consistent intended performance, and the ability to discern invalid or altered records.’ This could be VERY bad for the fledgling free and open source medical software industry if they have to pay for such validation. The complete text of Le Breton’s letter and discussion here at LinuxMedNews.com.”

GeekPAC looks for volunteer help, names Eric Raymond as board member

By Grant Gross

The American Open Technology Consortium, the geek lobbying organization that began getting media attention last week, has raised nearly $30,000 in pledges without really asking for them yet, and organizers are thinking about splitting the group in two comply with U.S. political action committee rules.
Organizer Jeff Gerhardt, host of the Linux Show, has revised the group’s position statement since news of the AOTC’s pending launch was first reported on NewsForge April 8. The goal of the AOTC itself, which organizers hope to create as a charitable organization, would to educate the public and politicians about issues near and dear to Open Source advocates and Internet users at large. The second organization, the proposed GeekPAC, would be a more traditional political action committee, with its focus on directly impacting the outcome of elections and legislation. GeekPAC wouldn’t accept corporate donations, while AOTC would.

“So far, in conversations with lawyers, the dual organization
structure proposed in the latest proposed Position Statement … has passed basic legal muster,” Gerhardt says. “So we are now interviewing lawyers for the task of creating
documentation on the PAC.”

Also announced today was the group’s first board member, veteran Open Source advocate Eric Raymond, with more to follow in the coming weeks. “We are
announcing Eric first, because he is helping craft the language of our
documents, and I think people ought to know that we are not doing this
alone,” Gerhardt says. “We are using some of the best geek minds in the world. “

In the meantime, AOTC would use more help to get launched, Gerhardt says. Although “we have had several hundred people pledge in spirit both volunteer sweat equity and cash” once the group launches, to the tune of nearly $30,000, an angel investor would help the group take its first steps, he says.

“The problem is, when we pick the law firm, we need seed money to get the process in motion,” he writes in an email to a couple of Web journalists today. “It will be way ‘cleaner’ if we can find an angel do donate
$5,000 to $10,000 to get the ball rolling. It will be way easier to
do this (legally), by getting all the money from a single source, rather
than by pushing the edge of the legal envelope, starting to do a general
fund raiser BEFORE the papers are filed. So guys, the bottom line is: we
need an angel. If you know of any dot com millionaires that have not been
wiped out yet — or any other folks whose largesse might be
attracted to our mission here, please spread the word.”

Organizers Gerhardt and Doc Searls of Linux Journal are also looking for two teams of volunteer Web developers to build sites for AOTC.info and GeekPac.org, both of which Gerhardt hopes to launch this week. Gerhardt and Searls are looking for developers at the moment, artists later.

“Although the AOTC site IS NOT going to be a news portal, we
are looking for people who have worked on a portal or who understand how to
harvest from other sites,” Gerhardt says. “We need to integrate stuff from at least four other sites into this site, and it is likely that list of source sites will grow.

“For the GeekPAC site we are looking for people who know CGI or JAVA (Tom Cat
available) and have at least a clue about MySQL database,” he adds. “We are going to
create a very elaborate ‘score card’ system for tracking house and senate
members and issuing them a ‘Report Card.’ From that report card we will be
integrating a payment system to donate moneys directly to campaign funds.
We are going to call this system ‘GeekPAC Incentive Bucks.’ “

AOTC organizers are also working on further documents that “discuss not just what
we are against, but what we are for and how we propose to do what we
suggest,” Gerhardt says. “Rather than just whine, we need to provide realistic alternatives that everyone can live with — or we will lose.”

Gerhardt says such position statements are necessary because AOTC is already being criticized as anti-business in some media, with its goals including a consumer-friendly Microsoft antitrust settlement and limits on corporate control of the Internet. “We do NOT want people to
think we are anti-business or anti-private property,” he says. “We are far from it. It
is just coming up with solutions that provide a safety net for everyone,
not just a corporate welfare program.”