Home Blog Page 8551

Free Standards Group, Tokyo University of Foreign Study launch Asian Scripts Technology & Infrastruc

Leslie Proctor writes: Asian Scripts Technology & Infrastructure (ASTI) will enable advanced localization capabilities for almost half the world’s population

The Free Standards Group’s Linux Internationalization Initiative (Li18nux) today announced the launch of the Asian Scripts Technology & Infrastructure (ASTI) project. ASTI, a joint project with the Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Study (ILCAA) and the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) will enable greater support and advanced functionality for Indic and Asian written languages.

ASTI will enable greater range of Asian and Indic scripts support in open source platforms and applications. One of the first tasks this year will be to create better support for Hindi, the fifth most common language in the world, enabling Web browser capabilities, Devernagari script and flexible input methods. ASTI plans to expand beyond Hindi in early 2003.

“Common localization standards and capabilities for the more than 6,500 languages spoken worldwide has remained an issue for computer developers and users worldwide,” Hideki Hiura, co-chair of the Li18nux project said. “Li18nux and ASTI address these issues, bringing advanced localization capabilities for Linux-based software.”

ASTI is supported by the Center of Excellence (COE) program of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, in cooperation with the Grammatological Informatics Based on Corpora of Asian Scripts (GICAS).

“This initiative will have broad implications in global enterprise, government, education and emerging markets,” said Scott McNeil, executive director of the Free Standards Group. “Through standardization and enhanced capabilities of multi-language support, Linux will broaden its user base, bringing the advantages of open source software to millions of people worldwide.”

ASTI will provide tools and abilities that will be compliant to Linux Internationalization Initiative (Li18nux) standards, bringing true portability of language to Linux. Li18nux 1.0, which was released earlier this year, provides a standard for common localization issues such as time, currency, language, etc.

“This is an epoch-making leap in multilingual computing,” said Professor Kazuhiko Machida, ASTI project leader for ILCAA. “ASTI will bring us to the next stage of complex text language processing.”

About the Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ICLAA)
ILCAA is a world leading research institute for South Asian and South-East Asian study for language and culture, powering language and cultural application study into the information technology via its Information Research Center. Information on ICLAA is available at http://www.aa.tufs.ac.jp/index_e.html.

About GICAS
The study led by Pari Bhaskararao, professor, ILCAA, nominated as a part of COE porogram of MEXT. Information on GICAS is available at www.gicas.jp/gicastest.html.

About the Free Standards Group
Supported by industry leaders, the Free Standards Group is an independent, vendor-neutral, non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating the use and acceptance of open source technologies through the development, application and promotion of standards. Headquartered in Oakland, Calif., the Free Standards Group fulfills a critical need in the open source development community to have common behavioral specifications, tools and APIs, making development across Linux distributions easier. More information on the Free Standards Group is available at www.freestandards.org.

About the Linux Internationalization Initiative (Li18nux)
Li18nux is an internationalization guide for platform and applications developers, allowing Linux and Linux-based programs to reach greater localization capabilities and obtain global reach. Li18nux was created to answer the critical need to have a common foundation for language globalization and includes vital tools needed by Linux distributions and applications in their globalization efforts. Information on Li18nux is available through the Free Standards Group web site, www.freestandards.org.

Category:

  • Linux

Red Hat Advanced Server: The real enterprise deal?

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

At first glance, Red Hat’s announcement of “Red Hat Linux Advanced Server, the first enterprise-class Linux operating system” sounds like just another dose of public relations hype. Another day, another Linux business announcement. But first impressions can be misleading. Many industry observers think the Advanced Server is a giant leap forward for enterprise Linux.In part they think that because of the customer star power Red Hat trotted out for its press conference. AOL, Merrill Lynch and Credit Suisse First Boston — these aren’t the financially ailing Burlington
Coat Factory — are top companies that will be deploying Red Hat Linux at their enterprise heart and not just in branch offices as inexpensive file/print servers. Stacey Quandt, Giga Information Group’s Open Source analyst, was impressed by the turnout of top financial companies and the degree of their Linux commitment. She says, “This is not just a marketing announcement, this is a serious announcement.”

On the other hand, competitors like SuSE and Caldera aren’t particularly impressed with the new Red Hat offering. Caldera’s CTO went as far as to say Linux doesn’t scale as well as its Unix products.

It’s not just the Red Hat customers and their wallet size that was impressive, though; Red Hat people claim RHLAS is a different take on Linux. Mark de Visser, Red Hat’s v.p. of marketing, says that before RHLAS, almost all major Linux distributions were general purpose and meant for everyone from “college students to the enterprise. But RHLAS is for the enterprise only.”

Bill Claybrook, research director for Linux and Unix at the Aberdeen Group, sees RHLAS as Red Hat’s way of “telling the computing business that they’re serious about getting Red Hat into the enterprise. Prior to this, they’ve been all over the place.”

One way de Visser says that Red Hat is stabilizing RHLAS is putting it on an 18-month
life cycle. The RHLAS that will be out next month, with a year of support and a starting price of $800, will use the same code base until well into 2004.

De Visser explains the logic for this is that independent software vendors are sick and tired of trying to keep up with Linux distributions’ six- to eight-month cycles and want a stable platform for their applications. In the enterprise market, where rock-solid, yet complex, applications are the rule rather than the exception, Red Hat believes this will lead more enterprise ISVs such as Oracle, SAP and Veritas to work more closely with RHLAS. Quandt agrees, saying that the move is “very smart.”

Technically, RHLAS does this by adopting such enterprise-friendly features as up to eight-way clustering and asynchronous input/output from the developmental Linux 2.5 kernel. De Visser says that enterprise customers, especially those who want to deploy database applications, must have these features, and the existing 2.5 code in these areas is mature enough that Red Hat has decided to deploy them today.

Claybrook agrees that to reach enterprise customers, Red Hat had to reach into mainstream Linux’s future. “Before RHLAS they didn’t have serious clustering or asynchronous I/O and without that they couldn’t run Oracle 9i RAC or other serious high-end DBMSes.”

Of course, some argue that Linux has been enterprise ready for some time. A SuSE
representative said, “What do you expect us to say, when RH announces to be the first, although SuSE successfully introduced the product (enterprise Linux) to the market six month ago!?”

Holger Dyroff, SuSE’s director of sales for North America, adds, “While other Linux companies are finally announcing their enterprise versions, SuSE Linux expands on a six-month lead into the corporate marketplace. Oracle, SAP and other major ISVs are supporting the SuSE Linux Enterprise Server while Compaq, IBM and other partners are delivering support and services.”

Caldera also takes a jaundiced view of Red Hat’s news. Drew Spencer, Caldera’s CTO, says, “Linux and Unix are complementary technologies.” While “Linux is ideal for solutions that require four-way or lower systems, for Web serving, file and print services … Caldera’s Unix [OpenServer and OpenUnix] environments are designed for low-end to high-end database solutions and can scale up to 32 processors, and systems that require extremely high workloads.”

In short, Caldera “believes, and some of Red Hat’s own industry partners will tell you, that Linux today cannot scale in the same way that Unix can,” he says. “Red Hat has failed to demonstrate that adding special sauce to Linux will make it scale. Red Hat is asking customers to take a risk by buying into this unproven solution.”

But de Visser says that replacing Unix is exactly what Red Hat Linux is doing now and will continue to do. “In the field, we’ve found that in 99 out of 100 cases, we’re replacing an existing old line Unix vendor deployment.” An IDC case study that was sponsored by Red Hat argues that Linux, due to its better total cost
of ownership, is a smarter deal for many business customers than RISC-based Unix.

Red Hat, according to de Visser, doesn’t see Caldera as one of its primary competitors.
This may be because their business models — Caldera’s reseller channel aimed at small- and medium-sized business, and RHLAS’s direct to enterprise customers approach — really don’t lead them to go to head to head with each other. SuSE, especially in the European market, is another matter.

All the analysts we spoke to, and de Visser, thought that in the long run Red Hat’s main competition will be Sun. Claybrook thinks that “Sun will be doing what Red Hat is doing now, but they’re already much bigger. Right now, Sun Linux is due late summer, if Sun makes a serious Linux-on-Intel move this could be scary for Red Hat.”

For now, though, while Caldera and other Unix and Linux companies might disagree, Quandt speaks for several analysts when she says, “RHLAS narrows the gap between Linux and Unix and widens the gap between mainstream Linux and Linux for the enterprise.” Now we’ll see if the customers agree.

Free Documentation Database

GFDD staff writes: “The GNUtemberg! Free Documentation Database is now ready for use.
http://www.gfdd.org – (http://www.gnutemberg.org)

Hello,

after some weeks over the keyboard we have reached a stable version of GFDD (GNUtemberg! Free Documentation Database) project.

Our target is to create a database to collect and classify the Free Documentation.
In the next 3/4 weeks on http://www.gfdd.org you will find a test version, where you will be able to insert documentation (real or invented).

For every doc you will introduce, you can indicate all the translation and/or all the published
version you know.

In this weeeks we would be glad to recieive as much feedback is possible, so come on…!

You can find GFDD at http://www.gfdd.org

After this testing fase, when all will be ready, GFDD will start truely.

Contact us!!
GFDD staff – gfdd.admins.NOSPAM@gnutemberg.org
Simone Merli, Donato Molino, Marco Presi, Gaetano Paolone”

Terra Soft ships Yellow Dog Linux 2.2

“Terra Soft Solutions, Inc., the leading developer of integrated PowerPC Linux solutions announces shipment of Yellow Dog Linux 2.2, the most mature and complete PowerPC Linux distribution available.” More at LinuxToday.

Linux-based POS systems increase 80% in 2001

“The population of Retail Point of Sale Terminals running Linux in North America increased 80% according to a new study released today from IHL Consulting Group. However, shipments of the popular open-source operating system actually decreased from 2000.” More at IHLServices.com.

GUADEC 2002 gathers top GNOME developers, enthusiasts

“The third annual GNOME User and Developer European Conference (GUADEC) boasts a program that includes top developers and Free/Open Source software luminaries.” More at LinuxPR.

Pretty geeky privacy

Salon.com: ” When Network Associates halted development of its widely respected PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) desktop encryption software in late February, Julian Koh worried about his “postcards.”

Koh considers everything that passes across the Internet — e-mail, mailing list postings, Web pages — as no more private than postcards that can be read by anyone along their path.”

Category:

  • Programming

Portlet application programming

JD writes: “Here’s a good 2 article series on Portlet programming. The first article walks you through some history of Portlets, why they are significant and what you can do with them using JSP components. The second article introduces Portlet-to-Portlet collaboration using Portlet messaging, advanced techniques for using messaging in your Portlets, and how to build a sample Portlets that can be used for highly functional messaging portlet applications..”

Category:

  • Linux

A tale of two Linux bootable business cards

By Russell C. Pavlicek

When you work with many different machines in many different
circumstances, you tend to assemble a toolbox of software to aid in
recovering malfunctioning systems. In an earlier
article, I mentioned that there are have been two mainstays in my
person toolbox: tomsrtbt, which I

reviewed for NewsForge in December 2001
, and the Linuxcare bootable
business card (BBC).

A little history

The Linuxcare bootable business card has a history that goes back to 1999,
when four Linuxcare employees designed a bootable Linux CD to be used for
rescuing damaged systems. The distribution was compact enough to fit on
the small business card-sized CDs. These CDs quickly became the talk of
the Linux trade show circuit, and the earliest editions of the CD were
among the most sought after giveaways at LinuxWorld and the Atlanta Linux
Showcase.

Much has changed in the Linux world since the initial appearance of the
Linuxcare BBC. Not the least of these changes is the Linuxcare BBC
itself. Over time, the BBC grew a usable X Window System that
was absent in the first edition, but it also grew a second distribution
entirely.

In a move somewhat reminiscent of the birth of Mandrake Linux, the
Linuxcare BBC has birthed two separate BBCs. In 1998, Mandrake was born
through an effort to integrate the KDE desktop into the downloadable
version of Red Hat Linux. Since then, Red Hat and Mandrake have focused
on different directions, creating two very strong Linux distributions.

In a similar fashion, the original Linuxcare BBC now has two heirs: the Linuxcare Bootable Toolbox
V2
and the LNX-BBC project
V1.618
. The four originators of the Linuxcare BBC have departed from
Linuxcare and have continued to work the original codebase with the aid of
other volunteers, creating the LNX-BBC project. The LNX-BBC project no
longer has ties to Linuxcare in any way, but the Open Source nature of the
code allows the developers to continue pursuing their original goal.

Linuxcare, on the other hand, has developed a new direction regarding the
BBC concept. The company wants to construct a modular system that will allow
developers there to keep their BBC current with the newest versions of software. To
this end, Linuxcare has created a new BBC, called the Linuxcare Bootable
Toolbox. Claiming that “LBT is not your ordinary BBC,” the Linuxcare
Bootable Toolbox V2 is a developer’s release. It isn’t meant to be a full
featured entry yet, but my testing reveals that it is quite useful in its
current state.

Just what is a BBC?

It is important to note that neither BBC is intended to be an end-user
Linux distribution. There are no fancy desktops, no automatic boot into X
Windows, and no mass of user applications. That is not the intention of
these BBCs. They are both meant to be powertools in the hand of
experienced Linux administrators.

Let me stress the word “experienced.” Like a novice running wild in the
root account, an inexperienced user can do serious damage to the target
system using a BBC. The intention of a BBC is to produce a
self-contained, bootable environment that allows you to make repairs on a
malfunctioning system. Most of the available tools are the standard
command line utilities, so if you need to rely on nice GUI tools, these
distributions are not for you.

I have used older Linuxcare BBCs to fix broken bootloaders, like LILO and
GRUB, by reconfiguring and reloading them. I frequently use them to test
newly acquired hardware to see what devices are detected and to give the
basic components a quick test. BBCs can be lifesavers for performing
emergency backup and restore procedures.

They are also very handy when a friend’s Windows box is hosed and you need
to copy a corrupted driver across a network to solve the problem. Using
Linux to solve a Windows problem is also a very effective form of Linux
advocacy, by the way. It raises the natural question, “Is it better to
run software that causes problems, or the software that fixes problems?”

Similarities

At the moment, both BBCs are fairly similar to use. Indeed, anyone with
enough expertise to use a BBC in the first place should be able to
navigate either one successfully.

Both CDs boot up and ask for a screen resolution. Do not take the
straight text option unless you know that you will not want to use the X
Window System at all. The rest of the options invoke framebuffer support,
which makes X usable for most systems.

Once the operating system starts, you can log in as root using the
instructions that appear on the screen. If you want to start X Windows,
you can simply use the “startx” command. Both use the Blackbox window
manager, and despite the lightweight nature of Blackbox, both
implementations allow you to customize the style of the desktop windows.

To configure the network, the “trivial-net-setup” script does it quickly
and easily, especially if you have a DHCP server available on the network.
Once the network is running, both BBCs come complete with the Lynx text
browser, as well as graphical browsers under X Windows.

Differences

There are a few differences between the BBCs, though. When you log into
LNX-BBC, you scroll through a text document that explains some of the
more important concepts and commands for using the CD. To review this
document at any time, just use the “help” command.

On the other hand, the Linuxcare Bootable Toolbox places you into a simple
menu when you log in. From the menu, you can mount and unmount disks,
configure the network interface, start X Windows, load PCMCIA devices, and
other basic tasks. You can also access the fledgling diagnostic system
called “Albert” which currently gives you some information about the
system (about the same information you used to get from the “MSD” command
under MS-DOS), but promises to eventually give you more interactive
options in the future. To restart the menu after exiting it, simply use
the “menu” command.

LNX-BBC mounts all Linux partitions in read-only mode upon startup. To
modify files, you will need to remount the partition read-write. LBT, on
the other hand, does not mount any hard drive partitions by default.
But the LBT menu can mount the disks quickly using their
normal mount points off the root partition. Unfortunately, it also
appears that it can delete your mount points under some circumstances,
which is an unwelcome surprise, but easy enough to repair.

Some subtle differences exist under X Windows as well. LBT includes
Mozilla as a browser, while LNX-BBC employs BrowseX. I should note that
this was my first time using BrowseX, and I am impressed. It
renders pages quickly and seems to handle most of them pretty well. I did
hit one email site that would not log in under BrowseX (linuxmail.org),
and another where the frames would get “weird” sometimes (Yahoo).
There were a couple of times when the vertical slider on the page
disappeared (quite annoying), but on the whole, BrowseX shows a lot
promise. It certainly seems like a potentially good choice for machines
that have limited memory.

The choices under the Blackbox window manager vary from one BBC to the
other. LNX-BBC includes the highly useful Ethereal program to monitor
ethernet activity. It also defaults to two workspaces (aka virtual
desktops) and even includes a couple of simple games to pass the time
while running tests. LBT has a simpler set of options, defaulting to a
single workspace with a menu including a couple of xterms, a calculator, a
clock, and Mozilla.

LNX-BBC also includes Memtest86
(which I reviewed in March) as a boot option. This is an excellent tool when
working with a machine that might have questionable memory.

Conclusion

Regardless of the subtle differences, the value of both BBCs remains
about the same. Both can do the essential tasks needed to rescue a
system. They can quickly create an environment where files can be
transported across a network. Hard drives and CDs can be
accessed. Programs can be executed. And all this can be accomplished
regardless of the integrity (or lack thereof) of the operating system
contained on the hard drives.

If you find yourself supporting PCs either at home or on the job, you
really should consider having one of these BBCs in your toolkit. They
give you a lot of power that literally fits in the palm of your hand. In
a world that freely hands out business cards, these are two business cards
that you really should not be without.

IBM, SuSE strike global Linux services deal

NewsFactor Network writes “IBM and Germany-based SuSE on Wednesday announced a partnership to provide Linux support and services to corporate customers. The deal reinforces open source software’s push into enterprise computing. Under the terms of the deal, IBM will package and support turnkey implementations of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) with backing from SuSE development, maintenance and support.The two companies said they will jointly offer a range of Linux services for business, including system integration and customization, rollout and implementation, and 24×7 worldwide maintenance and support.”