Home Blog Page 8850

P2P research report strips the hype from peer-to-peer

Author: JT Smith

Is Peer-to-Peer (P2P) technology following Napster into
oblivion, or is it quietly becoming an indispensible pillar of Network
computing? The “2001 P2P Networking Overview: The Emergent P2P Platform
of Presence, Identity, and Edge Resources,” a new research report from
O’Reilly & Associates, cuts through the hype and spells out the true
utility and innovation of Peer-To-Peer computing.

“In all the hype about P2P being the next big thing,” says Clay Shirky,
one of the report’s authors, “it’s all too easy to overlook the fact
that it is already a very useful thing.”

O’Reilly’s “2001 P2P Networking Overview” includes P2P company profiles
and evaluations as well as an in-depth explanation and assessment of
the underlying technologies. And finally, the report describes the
state of the industry with a data-based analysis of where it’s going.

“Peer-To-Peer is a mindset, not a particular technology, or even an
industry,” says Dale Dougherty, vice president of Online Publishing at
O’Reilly and one of the authors of the report. “P2P architectures offer
powerful approaches for fundamental problems of the Web–problems like
bandwidth cost, denial of service attacks, and the cost of maintaining
24/7 systems, etc. The key application areas of P2P are file sharing,
instant messaging, distributed computation, and P2P groupware.”

Given the wide range of applications for P2P technology, defining P2P
can be elusive. The Report’s authors conclude that what is truly
significant about P2P can be summed up as PIE–Presence, Identity and
Edge Resources. P2P effectively utilizes resources that are distributed
at the edge of the network, such as user’s PCs. A P2P application makes
use of these resources, knowing where they are and when they are
available. P2P is giving rise to technologies that manage identity and
presence, as evidenced in instant messaging applications, which are
becoming essential components in next generation application
environments such as Microsoft’s .NET.

“Peer-to-peer is more than just the basis for a few cool applications,”
Shirky adds, “it is a set of ideas about how to connect up the nodes at
the edges of the Internet, how to build robust applications on
distributed and unreliable hardware, and how to get at the vast
untapped computational resources that exist on the world’s PCs. Use of
decentralized resources is becoming part of every application designed
to operate at internet scale.”

About the “2001 P2P Networking Overview”
The “2001 P2P Networking Overview” from O’Reilly Research is a
comprehensive look at peer-to-peer from business and technical
perspectives. It describes the state of the industry and offers
opinions about where it’s going to go next, with hard data to back up
those opinions.

What you will find in the report:

  • Company profiles
  • In-depth explanations of the underlying technologies
  • P2P services: present and future
  • Analysis of the hype: what the press gets wrong
  • Estimates of mindshare and community size
  • Forecasts for the field

“2001 P2P Networking Overview:
The Emergent P2P Platform of Presence, Identity, and Edge Resources”
By Dale Dougherty, Clay Shirky, Kelly Truelove, Rael Dornfest,
Lucas Gonze & Madeline Schnapp
0-596-00185-1, 289 pages, $495.00
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/p2presearch/

“2001 P2P Networking Overview:” Ten Key Conclusions:
http://www.oreilly.com/news/p2pconclusions_0901.html

Executive Summary:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/p2presearch/summary/index.html

The first chapter is online at:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/p2presearch/chapter/ch01.html

Common misconceptions about P2P

From the authors of O’Reilly’s “2001 P2P Networking Overview: The
Emergent P2P Platform of Presence, Identity, and Edge Resources”

P2P = 100% Decentralization with no Guiding Intelligence
“A common misconception,” says Dougherty “is that P2P presents a binary
choice between centralization and decentralization. It’s rare that a
purely decentralized system is the right design choice. P2P means being
able to chose the appropriate balance between centralization and
decentralization–decentralizing those aspects of a system that can be
better handled at the edges of the network. Most P2P systems are in
fact ‘impure,’ relying on a central server or one or more ‘super peers’
to bootstrap connectivity or resource identification.”

P2P = Napster and Napster is now history
Because of all the press that Napster has garnered in the past year,
many people equate P2P with Napster, and intellectual property or
piracy issues. While not as newsworthy or sexy as consumer file-sharing
P2P applications, the enterprise P2P applications have received 69% of
the funding, and will continue to attract most of the investment
interest, with collaboration (specifically Groove) and distributed
computation accounting for 61% of those enterprise P2P application
dollars. “P2P technology is more than file sharing, and P2P file
sharing is more than Napster,” says Kelly Truelove, one of the report’s
coauthors.

P2P = Hot Air
“Pundits suggest that if peer-to-peer is neither a technology or a
business model, then it must just be hot air,” says Shirky. “There is,
however a third possibility besides ‘technology’ and ‘business.’ The
third way is simply this: Peer-to-peer is an idea. Put another way,
peer-to-peer is a related group of ideas about network architecture,
ideas about how to achieve better integration between the Internet and
the personal computer–the two computing revolutions of the last 15
years. These may be sloppy ideas, ideas that don’t describe a
technology or a business model, but they are big ideas, and they are
also good ideas. The world’s Net-connected PCs host, both individually
and in aggregate, an astonishing amount of power–computing power,
collaborative power, communicative power.”

P2P = File Sharing
“P2P is much more than simply file sharing. It includes distributed
computation–the ability to execute programs on remote PCs;
collaboration–the ability to interact and share information in
real-time; and instant messaging–the ability to initiate direct
communication with a person you know,” explains Dougherty.

P2P = Bleeding Edge Vaporware
Another common misconception is that P2P is a completely new concept.
Decentralization was an architectural principle of the Internet itself,
although over the past ten years or so, that has changed significantly.
“File-sharing systems are nothing new,” says Truelove. “File servers on
local area networks, FTP servers, and Web sites offering downloads all
pre-date Napster and it’s kin.

About O’Reilly:
O’Reilly & Associates, host of the first Peer-To-Peer Conference, is
the premier information source for leading-edge computer technologies.
We communicate the knowledge of experts through our books, conferences,
and web sites. Our books, known for their animals on the covers, occupy
a treasured place on the shelves of the developers building the next
generation of software. Our conferences and summits bring innovators
together to shape the revolutionary ideas that spark new industries.
>From the Internet to the Web, Linux, Open Source, and now peer-to-peer
networking, we put technologies on the map. For more information:
http://www.oreilly.com

O’Reilly is a registered trademark of O’Reilly & Associates, Inc. All
other trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Deconstructing software copyrights

Author: JT Smith

The study is at Bustpatents.com. “For over thirty years, software copyright has been a succession of court cases and law review articles based on bad law, bad logic, bad
mathematics, and/or bad physics (Benson, CONTU, Whelan and Altai being all of these). I have decided to write a critical review
arguing that software copyright (and dependents like TRIPS, GPL, Bernstein, Junger) should be abolished in light of 17 USC 102b and its
equivalents – for one reason – it is bad law with no logical basis in the mathematics and physics of information processing.”

Kernel Cousin KDE #24

Author: JT Smith

It’s at Zork.net. Among the items: “The feature freeze for KDE 3.0 is now in effect. This is less restrictive than a code, GUI or message freeze but
does mean that all the features that will be in KDE 3.0 are at least started in CVS. From here until the official release sometime in early
2002 the KDE developers will be focussing on stability and completeness.”

Category:

  • Open Source

Microsoft, researchers trade security blame

Author: JT Smith

From Reuters: “Computer security researchers on Tuesday accused
Microsoft of trying to avoid taking responsibility for fixing holes in its
software by making it harder for people who discover them to publicize
the security breaches.”

Category:

  • Linux

Compendium of *nix lpd vulnerabilities

Author: JT Smith

From The Register: “So many vulnerabilities affecting the lpd (line printer daemon) have come to light in
recent months that CERT/CC has issued a compendium advisory urging all users
and admins to review their system configurations and patch status.”

Category:

  • Linux

Annual Linux Showcase offers up free training for Linux newbies

Author: JT Smith

By Dan Berkes

Anyone who has ever helped a friend install Linux has probably heard these words: “Thanks! Now what?” The Fifth Annual Linux Showcase and Conference has experts on hand to answer that question, and tapping the font of wisdom won’t set you back a single penny.
ALS organizers decreed that admission to this year’s event should be free of charge. While the pay-to-play tutorials have been going on since Monday, the free technical sessions and exhibitions start Thursday morning and run through Saturday afternoon.

There are two free hands-on introductory Linux classes being offered this year. The first half of the all-day session focuses on the basic commands anyone will need to know in order to find their way around Linux from the command line. The second class gets graphical, showing newcomers how to configure and use the X Window System.

The classes cover areas of Linux that newcomers have the most questions about, but it’s likely that more help will be available outside of the available topics. As USENIX tutorial coordinator Dan Klein mentioned earlier, the community aspect of ALS makes it easy to find additional help from spontaneous “hall talks” before and after presentations.

Linux in Action classes take place on Thursday and Friday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Although the sessions are free, class size is limited, so it’s first come, first served.

The Fifth Annual Linux Showcase and Conference is taking place through this Saturday at the Marriott City Center at 1001 Broadway in Oakland, Calif. Registration is free.

BART is probably the easiest way to get to the conference from most Bay Area locations. Exit at 12th St. Oakland City Center station; walk one block to 11th Street and Broadway.

NewsForge parent OSDN is a major sponsor of the Fifth Annual Linux Showcase and Conference.

Category:

  • Linux

Red Hat suite makes e-commerce easy

Author: JT Smith

ZDnet has the review, calling Red Hat’s $2,995 E-Commerce Suite a “slick, well thought out and comprehensive solution that’s well worth your consideration.” Red Hat will also provide valuable “handholding.”

Category:

  • Linux

Turbolinux 7 Server, first distribution to conform to internationalization standard specification

Author: JT Smith

Turbolinux® Inc., a worldwide
leader in Linux operating environments and multi-platform software
deployment and management products enabling computing assets to be quickly
redefined on demand, today announced worldwide availability of Turbolinux
(TL) 7 Server on December 7th, 2001. With a focus on enterprise business,
TL 7 Server was developed with an eye towards extreme flexibility and
functionality.

“Turbolinux 7 Server offers businesses a highly secure, high-performance
operating system,” said Pete Beckman, vice president of engineering,
Turbolinux. “Turbolinux continues to satisfy the corporate world’s need for
ironclad network servers and is an excellent choice for businesses thinking
of migrating from Unix or Windows NT.”

Enterprise features include Large File Support (LFS), which provides support
for file sizes of 4 terabytes necessary for businesses that routinely
transmit or back up large files. The increasing use of Linux in animation
production and for scientific clustering (Editors: see Turbolinux Releases
Enfuzion 7.0, Makes Supercomputing Affordable, August 23, 2001) and the
continued growth of PC/x86 hardware for those applications has also
underscored the need for LFS.

In addition, Turbolinux 7 Server supports Logical Volume Manager (LVM),
which provides flexible disk volume management. LVM allows customers to
manage storage in a logical manner, for instance, combining disk drives to
function as a single disk, extending storage capacity simply.

Multi Language Support and International Certification
Turbolinux 7 Server comes with multi-language support and is the first Linux
distribution to conform to the basic level specifications of LI18NUX 2000
pilot program. LI18NUX is a voluntary working group, consisting of Linux
and open source related contributors – including Turbolinux – who are
working on internationalization of Linux distributions. The group focuses
on the internationalization of a core set of APIs and components of Linux
distributions in order to achieve a common Linux environment where an
internationalized Linux application can be executed and behave correctly
regardless of the underlying Linux distribution.

In keeping with this focus on internationalization, TL 7 Server is also
compliant with the new Chinese code standard, GB 18030. China has mandated
that any software application that is released for the Chinese market after
September, 2001, must support GB 18030. GB 18030 represents a
straightforward model to establish compatibility between Chinese national
coding and Unicode. Unicode provides a unique number for every character,
no matter what the platform, no matter what the program, no matter what the
language. It also enables a single software product or a single website to
be targeted across multiple platforms, languages and countries without
re-engineering.

TL 7 Server, based on Linux file directory standards has also passed the FHS
test suites. The FHS or File system Hierarchy Standard is the convention for
compliance between Linux and Unix. The FHS standard seeks to create
interoperability of applications, system administration tools, and
development tools across Linux and Unix operating systems.

“Turbolinux is continually working to achieve innovative products based on
open source and standards and we’re proud of our Internationalization
standing,” said Ly-Huong Pham, CEO, Turbolinux. “Through our work with
LI18NUX and our on-going product development, Turbolinux is continuing to
serve as a leader in the Linux community throughout Asia-Pacific, as well as
growing our market share in other regions.”

Turbolinux 7 Server and PowerCockpit(tm)
Turbolinux 7 Server, as well as other Linux distributions, can also be
deployed to multiple nodes by just a few clicks using another Turbolinux
product, PowerCockpit. Representing a radical shift in the way servers are
currently defined, PowerCockpit collects and deploys entire software stacks,
including the operating system, middleware, and applications, enabling
instant reconfiguration of computing systems. IT managers can reconfigure
and redeploy systems as the need arises, recycling computing power on
demand. Web servers, for example, can become application servers in 10
minutes or less using just a few simple commands. System integrators and
manufacturers can also use PowerCockpit to provide fast and efficient
configuration-to-order services by pre-configuring servers with customer
specified software stacks.

About Turbolinux
Founded in 1992, Turbolinux Inc. is a global software company providing
Linux operating environments and multi-platform software deployment and
management products that allow computing assets to be quickly redefined on
demand — enabling true flexible processing power. Backed by some of the
world’s leading technology companies, including Compaq, Dell, Fujitsu,
Hitachi, IBM, Intel, NEC, Novell, Oracle, SGI and Toshiba, Turbolinux is
headquartered near San Francisco with offices around the world. For more
information, visit the Turbolinux Web site at http://www.turbolinux.com.

Turbolinux is a registered trademark of Turbolinux, Inc. Linux is a
registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other registered trademarks
belong to their respective holders.

EuroLinux: Juridical coup at the European Patent Office

Author: JT Smith

Without waiting for the expected vote by
the European Union of a directive on the patentatibility of software,
the European Patent Office just published a new examination directive
which extends the realm of the European patent practice to software,
business methods and mathematics [1,2].

This decision constitutes a violation of the European democracy and a
provocation against European governments which had publicly stated
last November 2000 that they wanted tighter political control over the
European Patent Office and decided to preserve the exception for
computer programmes. [3] This shameful and unacceptable decision also
constitutes a violation of Article 22 of of the European Patent
Convention which stipulates that only the Enlarged Board of Appeal may
take decisions on significant patent policy issues. However, the
European Patent Office has extended the realm of the European patent
practice through hidden decisions of technical boards in order not to
ask their opinion to European governments. The European Patent Office
has tried to circumvent the democratic control of European Governments
through adventurous administrative processes. The European Patent
Office ignores its ruling authorities. [4] The European Patent Office
scorns the 80% of software companies which are against software
patents. [5, 6]

EuroLinux demands that European governments act firmly.

All projects of directive on the patentability of software, based on
the opinion of European governments, and written by the General
Directorate for Internal Market, require the European Patent Office to
act in a controlable and sensible way. However, control and common
sense do not seem to be appropriate terms for the current behaviour of
the European Patent Office. Therefore, EuroLinux demands governments
to

  • clearly state their oppositioons to the patentability of software
    and intangible innovations,
  • demonstrate to the public opinion their ability to control the
    European Patent Office by replacing urgently the current board,
    responsible of repeated violations of the European Patent
    Convention and of the Diplomatic Conference.

EuroLinux urges all companies, all software users and all citizens who
whish to protect software innovation in Europe and free competition in
the information society to join the 90.000 individual supporters and
300 corporate supporters of our petition for a software patent free
Europe [7].

References

[1] EPO Press Release for the new examination rules for software —
http://swpat.ffii.org/cnino/epgl01A/indexen.html

[2] New EPO examination rules for software —
http://www.epo.co.at/legal/gui_lines/f/c_iv_2.htm

[3] EPO Press Release after the November 2001 conference 2001 —
http://www.european-patent-office.org/news/pressrel/2000_11_29_e.htm

[4] Stealing with a Righteous Effect, a tale explaining how the EPO
could patent the unpatentable —
http://swpat.ffii.org/stidi/epc52/moses/indexen.html

[5] The Results of the European Commission Consultation Exercise —
http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/softanalyse.pdf

[6] Acceptable protection of software intellectual property: a survey
of software developers and lawyers —
http://www.pro-innovation.org/rapport_brevet/economy/elsevier/acceptable.pdf

[7] EuroLinux Petition — http://petition.eurolinux.org

About EuroLinux — www.EuroLinux.org

The EuroLinux Alliance for a Free Information Infrastructure is an
open coalition of commercial companies and non-profit associations
united to promote and protect a vigourous European Software Culture
based on Open Standards, Open Competition, Linux and Open Source
Software. Companies members or supporters of EuroLinux develop or sell
software under free, semi-free and non-free licenses for operating
systems such as Linux, MacOS or Windows.

The EuroLinux Alliance launched on 2000-06-15 an electronic petition
to protect software innovation in Europe. The EuroLinux petition has
received so far massive support from more than 90.000 European
citizens, 2000 corporate managers and 300 companies.

The EuroLinux Alliance has co-organised in 1999, together with the
French Embassy in Japan, the first Europe-Japan conference on Linux
and Free Software. The EuroLinux Alliance is at the initiative of the
www.freepatents.org web site to promote and protect innovation and
competition in the European IT industry.

Press Contacts

France & Europe: Jean-Paul Smets, jp@smets.com, +33-6 62 05 76 14
Germany & Europe: Harmut Pilch, phm@ffii.org, +49-89 127 89 608
Denmark and Northern Europe: Anne Østergaard, aoe@sslug.dk
Belgium: Nicolas Pettiaux, nicolas.pettiaux@linuxbe.org

Permanent URL for this PR
http://petition.EuroLinux.org/pr/pr14.html

Legalese

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
All other trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective
companies.

Using Debian on a 5-year-old laptop

Author: JT Smith

DebianPlanet readers address this question: “My friend has an old laptop that he bought 5yrs ago. He has no other computer
and doesn’t want to spend money on a new one. He needs are limited to about 3
tasks. Realability and simplicity a very important as he doesn’t have the time or
inclination to fix his system. He is smart (Medical doctor) and is happy to learn
new tools. He sees my system’s reliability and how its so customised to my needs
(gnome/konqueror/kmail/gqmpeg/emacs/octave). He has asked me if it is possible
to set up a simple system for him.

The Hardware: A 5 yr old laptop. I can’t remember the brand …
What software would you people recommend?”

Category:

  • Linux