Home Blog Page 9639

Japanese edition of SuSE Linux 7.1 released

Author: JT Smith

From Linux Today: “SuSE Linux today announced the complete SuSE Linux 7.1 package is now available in
Japanese as a free download with full support in Japanese. As worldwide economies tighten,
interest in Linux continues to grow. SuSE’s highly reviewed version 7.1 highlights the
company’s enterprise initiatives.”

Category:

  • Linux

Kernel Cousin KDE #7

Author: JT Smith

Aaron J. Seigo posts a summary of traffic and topics from the KDE mailing lists. The latest issue features discussion of KMail’s message scoring system, and extending the KDE Address Book.

Category:

  • Linux

Xfce 3.8.0 released

Author: JT Smith

The latest version of lightweight window manager Xfce is now available. Version 3.8.0 offers faster performance, uses less memory than previous versions, and features new tools including an SMB browser. More details at Moongroup; or download the program from xfce.org or SourceForge.

Category:

  • Open Source

Kernel traffic #115

Author: JT Smith

Zack Brown posts the latest summary of traffic on the linux-kernel mailing list. Hot topics in this issue include discussion on the status of CML3 and debate over the spam filtering used on the mailing list.

Category:

  • Linux

Red Hat 7 insecure umask

Author: JT Smith

“The Redhat useradd script creates a group for the new user with the
same name as the username by default. When the user logs in, any
shell that uses /etc/profile will set the umask to 002 if the user’s
username and groupname match and their uid is greater than 14. If the
user then issues su to become root without specifying the -l option the
root account inherits the umask of 002. As root the user may then create
files with somewhat insecure permissions. Redhat seemed to understand
that system users should have a umask of 022, because /etc/profile will
set the umask that way for users loging in with a uid less than 14, but
they forgot about su.” Full details at Help Net Security.

Category:

  • Linux

Even experts confounded by XML Schema

Author: JT Smith

ZDNet has an item on the upcoming release of the W3C’s long-awaited XML Schema. Reportedly, the Schema is so complex that several XML experts have decided to create alternative, more understandable versions.

Category:

  • Protocols

Sun fires peer-to-peer shot

Author: JT Smith

ZDNet: “As it kicks off its newest technology initiative, Sun
Microsystems is training gunfire on one of its oldest
enemies: Microsoft.

Sun this week expects to launch Jxta, an open source
project to develop infrastructure software for peer-to-peer
applications. What does Sun hope to accomplish with
Jxta? Perhaps nothing more than to establish a
beachhead against Microsoft in the emerging – and, so
far, mostly hype-driven – area of P2P, a computing model
in which users’ computers exchange data directly.”

Category:

  • Open Source

Mandrake 8.0 via Swarmcast

Author: JT Smith

The problem with grabbing a hot new version of your favorite distribution on the day of release is that everyone else wants to do the same. Now you can get at least one distribution — Mandrake 8.0 — without having to deal with slow, overburdened servers. As this article at Teledynamics explains, it’s all thanks to Swarmcast, a new file transfer technology with a P2P architecture for distributing network load.

Category:

  • Linux

Review: PostgreSQL, Introduction and Concepts

Author: JT Smith

Carlie wrote in to let us know that Linuxiso.org has a review of Bruce Momjian’s book, “PostgreSQL, Introduction and Concepts.”

Review: Plextor CD-RW comparison

Author: JT Smith

– By Jeff Field

A year or so ago, I purchased a 4x CD-RW drive. The thing seemed pretty fast, and I was happy with it writing CDs and CD-RWs at 4x. It did not have a good read speed, but it burned reasonably fast and was certainly a good drive at the time, if not the top of the line. Now for about $200 you can pick up 16x write/10x rewrite drives that blow away what I bought a year ago — the question is, how much of a difference do these drives make?
Most of us know that in CD-ROM drives, going from your run-of-the-mill 32x CD-ROM to a 48x CD-ROM really does not make much of a difference, because in both cases the speed is the theoretical maximum that the drives can reach. It’s not the average speed, which is much slower overall, sometimes less than half as fast as the CD-ROM makers claim. However, for the most part, when CD-rewriteable manufacturers claim to make their drives at a certain speed, they mean it. Recently I got my hands on the Plextor 16/10/40A — the latest, bleeding edge CD-RW drive from Plextor.

The 16/10/40A
The drive itself is very similar to its 12X siblings — it has the same one-light, one-button face as the 12/10/32A with the ventilation fan of the 12/10/32S. It is a trayloader, and if not for the writing on the drive, you probably would not be able to tell the 12 and 16x models apart. The 16x not only advertises faster writing capabilities, it has faster reading speeds, too, clocking in at 40x. Like the 12/10/32A it has Sanyo’s BURNProof technology, used to combat bad burns.

Speed
Looking for better ways to benchmark these drives under Linux, I have benchmarked both IDE Plextor drives as well as my old IDE 4x4x32 Acer. To do the read benchmarks, I used the command time mkisofs -R -o cdimage.raw /mnt/cdrom. I then took the number of bytes transfered (in this case 503 megabytes) and the time the operation took, in order to determine the megabytes per second. To determine the write speed, I used the command cdrecord -v -dev=0,0 speed=XX (driveropts=burnproof) cdimage.iso where XX is the maximum write speed of the drive and the “driveropts=burnproof” option was only used on the Plextor drives. The ISO image used for writing was 501 megabytes in size. Here are the results:

Speed test results

Drive Reading Writing
Acer 4x4x32 8.14X – 1.19MB/s 3.97x – 0.58MB/s
Plextor 12/10/32A 13.03X, 1.91MB/s 12.16x – 1.78MB/s
Plextor 16/10/40A 12.57x, 1.84MB/s 13.43x – 1.97MB/s

The results of these tests are very interesting. We see that on the Acer 4x4x32, the read speed is abysmal, coming in at a quarter of the advertised “maximum read speed,” which in this case is quite deceptive. Its write speed, however, is right on par with what it advertises — 3.97x is certainly close enough to 4x that I will not notice the difference. The Plextor drives, on the other hand, while not on average getting close to their advertised maximum speed, certainly do much better than the similarly advertised Acer drive from a year ago. In fact, oddly enough, the 12/10/32A ousts the 16/10/40A in the read benchmarks. As for write speed, we see something very interesting — clearly, the jump from 4x to 12x is a big one — you really are seeing the full benefit. However, when going from 12x to 16x we find that in fact the drive performs a lot closer to 13x. This happened consistently, and makes me wonder if the same thing that happened to CD-ROM drives will happen to CD-RW drives — companies increasing the “maximum speed” in order to create a false need for upgrades. I hope not, because purchasing a CD-RW drive is confusing enough already.

Conclusions
To get the full benefit of this review, you should read both the 12/10/32A and 12/10/32S reviews. This comparison introduces Plextor’s latest drive, which has turned out to be the least impressive — a good drive, without a doubt, but not worth more money than the 12/10/32A, and certainly not better than the 12/10/32S. We also get an interesting look at the possibility of the CD-RW speed curve getting steeper; for the first time a newer model does not live up to its speed name. We also see that we have come a long way from a year ago, now being able to write a full CD in about five minutes, something nice for those who want to put together an audio CD before they run out the door. My recommendation for CD-RW drives still rests with the 12/10/32A, because it is relatively inexpensive and performs about the same as the 16/10/40A. The 16/10/40A can be found on Pricewatch for $209.

NewsForge editors read and respond to comments posted
on our discussion
page
.

Category:

  • Unix