Here is a digest version (I added bolding and italics for this submission…they are not in the original -dcm):
—–
Slouching Towards Hollywood – John Perry Barlow on Stoned Out Loud
submitted byD.Manchester for Stoned Out Loud
—————–
Slouching Towards Hollywood
Creative Livelihood in an Economy of Verbs
“By” John Perry Barlow
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has
come.– Victor Hugo
The great cultural war has broken out at last.
Long-awaited by some and a nasty surprise to others, the conflict between the Industrial Period and the Virtual Age is now engaged in earnest, thanks to the modestly conceived but paradigm-shattering thing called Napster.
What Napster’s first realization of global peer-to-peer networking made inevitable is not so different from what happened when the American colonists realized that the conditions of their New World were sufficiently different from those of ancient England that they would be obliged to cast off the Crown before they could develop an economy natural to their environment. For the settlers of cyberspace, the “shot heard ’round the world” was fired on July 26 by Judge Marilyn Patel when she enjoined Napster and thereby sought to silence the cacophonous free market of expression already teeming with over 20 million directly-wired music lovers…
The war is on, all right, but to my mind, it’s over. The future will win.
There will be no property in cyberspace. Behold DotCommunism.
(And dig it, ye talented, since it will enrich you
It’s a pity that the entertainment industry is too wedged in the past to recognize this, as they will thereby require us to fight this war anyway. So we will all enrich lawyers with a fortune that could be spent fostering and distributing creativity. And we will be forced to watch a few pointless public executions – Shawn Fanning’s cross awaits – when we could be employing such condemned genius in the service of a greater good.
As the inevitable unfolds, the real challenge arises: It’s one thing to win a revolution and quite another to govern its consequences…
All these examples point to the same conclusion: non-commercial distribution of information increases the sale of commercial information. Abundance breeds abundance.
This is precisely contrary to what happens in a physical economy.
When you’re selling nouns, there is an undeniable relationship
between scarcity and value. Adam Smith figured that out a long time ago. But in an economy of verbs, the inverse applies. There is a relationship between familiarity and value. For ideas, fame is fortune. And nothing makes you famous faster than an audience willing to distribute your work for free…
Before I go further in explaining what I mean, let me state a creed:
Art is a service, not a product. Created beauty is a relationship,
and a relationship with the Holy at that. To reduce such work to “content” is like praying in swear words. End of sermon. Back to business.
The economic model that supported most of the ancient masters
Patronage is both a relationship and a service…
But patronage never went away. It just changed its appearance. Marc Andresson was a beneficiary of the “patronage” of the National Center for Supercomputer Applications when he created Mosaic; CERN was a patron to Tim Berners-Lee while he created the World Wide Web. DARPA was Vint Cerf’s benefactor; IBM was Mandelbrot’s.
“Aha!” you say, “but IBM is a corporation. They profited from the intellectual property Mandelbrot created.” Maybe, but so did the rest of us. While IBM would patent air and water if it could, I don’t believe it ever attempted to file a patent on fractal geometry….
In general, if you substitute “relationship” for “property,” you begin to
understand why a digitized information economy can work fine in the absence of enforceable property law. Cyberspace is unreal estate. Relationships are its geology…
Finally, there is the role of ethics…. As http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/
Besides, the more connected we become, the more obvious it is that we’re all in this thing together. If I don’t pay for the light of your creation, it goes out and the place gets dimmer. If no one pays, we’re all in the dark. In cyberspace, it becomes increasingly obvious that what goes around comes around. What has been an ideal become a sensible business practice…
story at:
http://www.stoned-out-loud.com,
http://www.stonedoutloud.com,
http://stoned-out.blogspot.com,
http://stoned-out-loud.tripod.com,
http://stonedoutloud.com,
http://stoned-out-loud.com
—–
related:
Electronic Frontier Foundation