Home Blog Page 2156

Review: Free, Open Source VirtualBox Lags Behind VMware and Parallels

Our Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion shootout took a deep dive into the two most successful commercial virtualization products for the Mac, but many of you had questions about VirtualBox, the free and open source desktop virtualization software currently offered by Oracle. Both Parallels and VMware offer plenty of features for home and business users, but is VirtualBox an acceptable alternative for the cash-strapped?

The focus of this article, as it was in our VMware and Parallels comparison, will be on running Windows 7 and Windows 8 guests on an OS X host, but VirtualBox’s cross-platform nature means that many of the observations made in this article will also apply to VirtualBox running on Windows and Linux hosts. One of the only differences is that OS X virtual machines, which are still labeled as an experimental feature in the current version of the software, are officially supported only within OS X hosts, both because of Apple’s licensing stipulations and because OS X won’t run on all of the CPUs that Windows and Linux can use.

For this article, I have attempted to evaluate VirtualBox both on its own merits and based on the criteria we laid out in our Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion shootout. I used a 2011 iMac with OS X 10.8.2 installed, and tested 64-bit versions of both Windows 7 and Windows 8 running in VirtualBox 4.2.1.

Read 27 remaining paragraphs | Comments

 

Read more at Ars Technica

OpenNebula Survey Shows Industry Use Dominating

Industry use of the mature open source IaaS cloud platform dominates the recent user survey as a beta version of OpenNebula 3.8 is released.

Read more at The H

Which Distros Would Obama and Romney Use?

With fewer than 30 days remaining until the U.S. presidential election, it’s become more or less impossible to hear ourselves think here in the Linux blogosphere, so loud is the din emanating from the land of stars and stripes. Of course, misery loves company, which probably explains why there’s nary an unoccupied barstool at the Punchy Penguin Pub. Linux Girl arrived early, so she had plenty of opportunity to drown her political sorrows while listening in on all the latest discussions.

 

Read more at LinuxInsider

Fedora is Retiring Smolt Hardware Census

The Fedora Infrastructure team has announced that it will retire its hardware profiling application Smolt at the beginning of November. At that point, the smolts.org web site will be shut down as well.

Read more at The H

Linux Developers Still Reject NVIDIA Using DMA-BUF

Going back to the beginning of this year there’s been talk of NVIDIA looking at Optimus support for Linux and in August they confirmed they were working on NVIDIA Optimus Linux support. As part of their Optimus Linux implementation they want to use DMA-BUF for the multi-GPU interactions just like the open-source drivers, so that they can all work together. However, kernel developers continue to reject this notion.

 

Read more at Phoronix

Three New Widgets in jQuery UI 1.9.0

The jQuery UI update gets Menus, Spinners and Tooltips, along with more API redesigns for existing widgets and improved widget accessibility.

Read more at The H

AMD Turbo Core Performance Under Linux

As the latest AMD A10-5800K Trinity APU benchmarks under Linux, here’s a quick look at the impact that Turbo Core Technology has under Linux…

 

Read more at Phoronix

Korea Linux Forum Hosts Kernel Collaboration Gangnam Style


This week The Linux Foundation is hosting its first-ever event in South Korea, the Korea Linux Forum in the Gangnam District. This was planned long before PSY’s Gangnam-style videowent viral but who are we not to do our part in contributing to this craze and honoring our host location?

 

tux gangnamNo, that’s not Linus; though, he is at the event this week, as are Linux kernel maintainers Greg Kroah-Hartman, Ted Ts’o and others. The event is focused on bringing together Korean and mainline Linux kernel developers to advance Linux for the global community. There is a wealth of developer talent in Korea and we’re excited about what Samsung and other Korean companies are contributing to Linux.

The keynotes and conference sessions have been specifically selected to facilitate this collaboration, focusing on embedded, storage, performance, filesystems and and how to successfully contribute code to the Linux kernel.

Samsung earlier this year joined The Linux Foundation as a platinum member, signaling the importance of Linux in mobile computing, in Korea and among Korean companies. You can see the result of Samsung’s engagement with the Linux community in action with their contribution of 13,000 lines of code for the F2FS file system last week to the Linux kernel. Samsung is invested in F2FS because it’s designed for NAND flash-memory-based devices, which have unique storage characteristics. Today at Korea Linux Forum there is a workshop dedicated to this where Ted Ts’o will discuss the filesystem and collaborate with Samsung and other developers about how to advance it for Linux. The future of Linux is mobile and the future of mobile is flash storage. This collaboration makes Linux stronger and is good business for Samsung. We are excited to play a small role here at The Linux Foundation to accelerate this technical collaboration.

Thanks again to host sponsor Samsung. We also want to thank Platinum amd closing reception sponsor Intel; Gold sponsors Black Duck Software, Google and NHN; and Silver sponsor ENEA.

Now, get your dance on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZkp7q19f0″ frameborder=”0

 

Moving to the Cloud? 5 Key Tax Issues to Consider

 When it comes to adopting new technologies such as the cloud, most CIOs are well-versed in a standard set of key issues that should be factored into their decisions, including the need for security, the availability of the necessary resources, and compatibility with the company’s existing infrastructure.

cloud taxesAnother important consideration IT executives are particularly apt to overlook, however, is the tax perspective.

That’s according to a recent survey by audit, tax and advisory firm KPMG, which found that “tax departments are being left out of discussions as their companies consider moving operations to the cloud, raising the possibility of tax risks, lost cost-saving opportunities and decreased return-on-investment for cloud projects.”

‘A Critical Gap’

In fact, a full 52 percent of the 206 senior U.S. corporate tax professionals surveyed by KPMG in May said they are generally not included in discussions with top management of other groups in their organizations to provide tax perspective on cloud initiatives. 

Only 7 percent of respondents said they were involved in regular discussions; 41 percent said they were included occasionally.

“The fact that there currently appears to be limited connectivity and virtually no joint strategic planning between tax and other corporate functions highlights a critical gap – one that can create an opportunity for organizations that think differently and develop IT service delivery approaches that are much more tax efficient,” noted Rick Wright, KPMG’s global cloud enablement leader in a press release.

5 Issues to Keep in Mind

Toward that end, Linux.com recently asked Reid Okimoto and Tom Hayes, both members of KPMG’s Tax Cloud Enablement Team, for some advice on how IT executives can better handle the tax question. In response, they offered five key tax issues CIOs should consider before moving to the cloud.

1. New Liabilities and Requirements

First, be aware that “migrating or expanding existing IT infrastructure can enlarge your company’s taxable presence and create new tax liabilities and reporting requirements,” Okimoto and Hayes pointed out.

2. Unexpected Taxes

Also important to know is that “your company may be subject to sales tax, or a compensating use tax, for services your company purchases from cloud providers, even though the provider does not charge sales tax on the invoice,” they noted. “This situation often occurs not because providers are trying to hide or avoid collecting the sales tax, but because cloud providers often do not have a legal obligation to collect a sales tax due to lack of presence or nexus with a taxing jurisdiction.” 

Either way, however, “these unexpected sales or use taxes may significantly impact the economics of your cloud migration strategy,” they warned.

3. Location Matters

The location of both cloud assets — such as servers supporting a private or hybrid cloud — and supporting personnel for companies either adopting a private or hybrid cloud solution or migrating legacy business offerings to the cloud should be carefully evaluated against both business and tax considerations, Okimoto and Hayes advised.

“The location of these assets and functions in certain jurisdictions may erode any savings, efficiencies, or opportunities associated with the company’s cloud efforts,” they explained. 

4. Disappearing Benefits

Also keep in mind that if embracing the cloud allows your company to dispose of or reduce IT infrastructure or other capital assets for which it had previously negotiated tax benefits or related incentives, it may lose the benefits or even be required to repay those already received, they said.

5. Brand-New Incentives

Conversely, however, “when establishing a new data center or expanding an existing facility, your company may be able to negotiate incentives in many tax jurisdictions,” Okimoto and Hayes noted.

“The challenge, though, is finding the incentives that may be available and applicable,” they added. “These incentives can often be large enough to influence the site-selection process and significantly affect the overall return-on-investment calculations.”

Bottom line? “KPMG advises that CIOs involve their tax department early on when making decisions about moving to the cloud,” Okimoto and Hayes concluded. “As part of this conversation, the IT group will want to discuss any requirements that tax may have regarding the necessity to track cloud usage in order to substantiate cloud payments for tax purposes and meet tax compliance requirements within the United States as well as internationally.” 

Reid Okimoto is a senior manager in the State and Local Tax practice of KPMG LLP; Thomas Hayes is a managing director in the International Corporate Services practice of KPMG LLP. Both are based in KPMG’s Seattle office and are members of the firm’s Tax Cloud Enablement team.  

These comments represent the views of the authors only, and do not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Microsoft: Radical Shift to Devices, Risk Ahead of Windows 8

Microsoft makes it official: The company is now a devices and services company. Unfortunately, that transition away from high margin software licenses may be rocky.

Read more at ZDNet News