Home Blog Page 2814

Good News for Linux Users From Broadcom

Last week, Broadcom announced they have open sourced the drivers for their latest 802.11n chipsets. This is significant because as closed source drivers, their chipsets were basically non-functional with Linux. By open sourcing these drivers, they can now be included in the Linux kernel. Broadcom joins virtually all other chipset suppliers who have made their drivers open source and compatible with Linux for some time. This driver is now in the staging kernel tree and should be mainlined in a future version of Linux, most likely 2.6.37.

We are extremely happy to see this change for multiple reasons. One: it’s obviously good to have more technology available to use; we want technology to “just work” with Linux and since Broadcom is a major technology supplier their absence from the mainline kernel was significant. Two: we have been working with our Technical Advisory Board on this issue for the last few years to educate vendors on Linux’ model and why it’s in their interest to open source their drivers. (For more detail on Linux’ approach to driver inclusion support, you can read our publication explaining the model here.)

A few years ago there was some hesitation from a few vendors, usually resulting from misunderstanding of legal and technical issues more than anything real. Gradually, those objections have all been erased, and we are now seeing unprecedented support of the open source development way of driver development. Broadcom was one of the last holdouts, so it’s very gratifying to see this change.

As Katherine Noyes says in this PC World article, “Every major 802.11 wireless driver has now been open sourced, effectively removing wireless as a point of potential concern for businesses and individuals considering moving to Linux. The move also signifies Broadcom’s long-awaited recognition that Linux users are now so numerous as to constitute a force to be reckoned with and a market to be served.”

Make no mistake: Broadcom didn’t open source this driver to support peace, love and Linux. Companies who have included their drivers in the mainline Linux kernel do so because it benefits them. Once the driver is included in the mainline, the maintenance costs associated with keeping up with kernel changes drop considerably. Also, as Katherine points out, they undertook this work because they see a market and realize that many of their competitors, like Intel, have been enjoying an advantage their open-ness affords them.

In short, mainlining works and we’re extremely pleased to see Broadcom’s effort and look forward to collaborating with them on future drivers.

Read more at Jim Zemlin’s Blog

Does Linux Offer Too Much Choice?

User choice is one of the hallmarks of the Linux world, and most seem to agree that it’s a good thing. One might even go so far as to say it’s a big part of the reason so many of us embrace Linux. Every once in a while, however, a naysayer pipes up with concern that the choice is too much, and that’s just what happened earlier this month. “The trouble with Linux: there’s too much choice” was the title of the post that sparked the debate this time around, and quite a debate it has been.

Read more at LinuxInsider

Google Code now accepting all OSI approved licences

Google has announced that its open source Google Code project hosting service now supports any Open Source Initiative (OSI) approved licence

Read more at The H

Smalltalk web framework Seaside reaches version 3.0

The Smalltalk web framework Seaside version 3.0 washes up a re-factored and simpler core library to act as the foundation for future development

Read more at The H

Linux 2.6.36-rc4 Brings Two Weeks Of Fixes

Due to LinuxCon Brazil there’s been two weeks that have passed since the third release candidate was tagged for the Linux 2.6.36 kernel, but on Sunday afternoon Linus christened Linux 2.6.36-rc4…

 

Read more at Phoronix

ARM Aims Disruptive Technology at HPC Market

ARM has long been rumored to have designs on the HPC market, and last week they made their intentions clear by disclosing details of their 2.5 GHz Cortex A15 processor, codnamed “Eagle.” An EE Times article described the A15 as a 2.5 GHz superscalar processor with eight-way multicore capabilities and multiprocessing support:

From here on up, the Eagle is clearly aimed not at advanced smartphones or mobile media devices, but at the network infrastructure, server, and cloud-computing space. To begin with, the A15 architecture is designed for big-machine problems. The total address space is 1 terabyte, far in excess of the needs of mobile or embedded computing.

While ARM provided few technical details, they noted that A15 performance would be about five times that of the previous top-of-the-range Cortex A9. And if they can deliver, I’m thinking this kind of performance combined with low-power requirements might just be the ticket for datacenters of the future.

Read more at insideHPC

A First Look At The 2010 Linux Graphics Survey Results

Earlier this month we started once again our annual Linux Graphics Survey in which we poll our readers about their choices and opinions concerning graphics cards, display drivers, and other graphics / X.Org related features of the Linux desktop. While this survey is still going on through the end of September — so you still have time to participate — here are the results from the first 6,300 people to submit their responses. We are publishing the results so far since there is the X Developers’ Summit this week in Toulouse and some of these findings may prove to be useful during those discussions.

 

Read more at Phoronix

SciDB – relational daddy answers Google, Hadoop, NoSQL

Stonebraker doesn’t drop ACID

Mention “relational databases” and a few peoples’ names might spring to mind: Oracle’s Larry Ellison, thanks to his billions, or Monty Widenius, main author of the ferociously popular MySQL. Geekier types might plump for Oracle’s former Dr. DBA Ken Jacobs or open-sourcer Brian Akers who helped architect MySQL.…

Read more at The Register

Will Google’s Chrome OS be dead on arrival?

Here’s a ComputerWorld column suggesting that ChromeOS may face a difficult future. “Chrome-based notebooks are still months away from release, but it’s not at all clear that when they finally arrive, people will want them. Given that Android tablets and Windows-based netbooks will be likely available at the same price as Chrome netbooks, will anyone want to buy a device that isn’t designed to run local apps?” A better question might be: how will ChromeOS change so that the first official release is competitive with the alternatives?

Read more at LWN

Apple faces far-reaching foe in Android

Time will tell if a Gartner forecast of explosive Android market growth is true. But a simple example in the present makes an equally compelling argument for Android’s potential.

Read more at CNET News